--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-12 12:26 ---
*** Bug 41218 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33015
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-12 03:28
---
With all due respect for Cowan, I think that the program should be revised to
use standard code, or at least not use this particular feature. The last
revision of the program was in 2004. I agree we should close
--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-11 16:38 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Just for completeness: This is a regression with regards to g77.
The standards are a mouthful already. Do we need every extension that there
ever was? Besides this PR, demand was non-exist
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last recon
