http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32890
Bug 32890 depends on bug 29962, which changed state.
Bug 29962 Summary: Initialization expressions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29962
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-06 21:17 ---
FIXED on the trunk (4.5). Close.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-06 18:51 ---
Subject: Bug 32890
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Jun 6 18:51:29 2009
New Revision: 148237
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148237
Log:
fortran/
2009-06-06 Daniel Franke
PR fortran/32890
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-04-05 17:58 ---
> I only recently committed a fix to the dev-branch (#3).
Now I understand my mistake: pr30814 was fixed for runtime if compiled with
-fbounds-check. The patch in fortran-dev gives the error at compile time (much
bet
--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-05 17:38 ---
I only recently committed a fix to the dev-branch (#3). I'll merge this fix
together with all the other check and simplification changes to trunk when they
are complete. Not sure about backports, though.
--
http
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-04-05 17:08 ---
There is something weird here. This pr looks to be a duplicate of pr30814,
which is supposed to be fixed since 2007-07-24 (r126866) or 2007-07-29
(r127049: two commits to trunk if I am not mistaken).
The problem seem
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-23 19:33 ---
Subject: Bug 32890
Author: dfranke
Date: Mon Mar 23 19:33:39 2009
New Revision: 145011
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145011
Log:
gcc/fortran/:
2009-03-23 Daniel Franke
PR fortran
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-03 21:22 ---
For constant arguments, the simplifier (which isn't implemented yet) should
make detection possible. Blocking 29969 although no init expression is involved
here. However, PACK is one of those functions that require a
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-01 06:00 ---
Setting to "enhancement", as we now detect the error
at runtime.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot
|
11 matches
Mail list logo
