[Bug fortran/32436] Compile fails on compilation of compile_options.o

2007-06-20 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 20:38 --- *** Bug 32438 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32436

[Bug fortran/32436] Compile fails on compilation of compile_options.o

2007-06-20 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 20:34 --- (In reply to comment #6) > 2>&1 If you want to investigate this further, you need to run it directly from command line, not within make, so that output is not redirected. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_

[Bug fortran/32436] Compile fails on compilation of compile_options.o

2007-06-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 20:31 --- > Huh -- that's very sad... I was hoping to use this on my new laptop :-(... You can use 4.2.0 which is better (and really) supported for x86 Darwin. I fixed a couple of bugs relating to x86 darwin support only fo

[Bug fortran/32436] Compile fails on compilation of compile_options.o

2007-06-20 Thread danp57 at optonline dot net
--- Comment #7 from danp57 at optonline dot net 2007-06-20 20:29 --- Subject: Re: Compile fails on compilation of compile_options.o Huh -- that's very sad... I was hoping to use this on my new laptop :-(... Perhaps this can become a testcase to fix this up? Dan dfranke at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/32436] Compile fails on compilation of compile_options.o

2007-06-20 Thread danp57 at optonline dot net
--- Comment #6 from danp57 at optonline dot net 2007-06-20 20:28 --- Subject: Re: Compile fails on compilation of compile_options.o /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile /Users/platt/platt/install/GccSources/gcc-4.1.2.build/./gcc/xgcc -B/Users/platt/platt/install/GccSources/gcc-4.1.2.bui

[Bug fortran/32436] Compile fails on compilation of compile_options.o

2007-06-20 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 19:44 --- > does the FSF 4.1 branch officially support i386-darwin? The testresults-ml does no show to many entries for 4.1.x on i386-darwin. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32436

[Bug fortran/32436] Compile fails on compilation of compile_options.o

2007-06-20 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 19:40 --- Doh, I have another question: does the FSF 4.1 branch officially support i386-darwin? I'm not sure it does... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32436

[Bug fortran/32436] Compile fails on compilation of compile_options.o

2007-06-20 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 19:37 --- > ../gcc -I../../../gcc-4.1.2/libgfortran/../gcc/config -I../.././gcc > -D_GNU_SOURCE -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wold-style-definition -Wextra -Wwrite-strings -O2 -g -O2 -c > ../.

[Bug fortran/32436] Compile fails on compilation of compile_options.o

2007-06-20 Thread danp57 at optonline dot net
--- Comment #2 from danp57 at optonline dot net 2007-06-20 19:34 --- Subject: Re: Compile fails on compilation of compile_options.o I started in a freshly created empty directory! Dan On Jun 20, 2007, at 3:30 PM, dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #1 from d

[Bug fortran/32436] Compile fails on compilation of compile_options.o

2007-06-20 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32436

[Bug fortran/32436] Compile fails on compilation of compile_options.o

2007-06-20 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 19:30 --- Since GCC gets compiled over and over again, it is highly unlikely that a release branch simply fails like that. There is no actual problem shown?! You started the compilation in a clean directory? -- dfranke a