--- Comment #7 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-02 20:46 ---
Closing as Fortran FE is fixed. There is 32503 for better vectorization of
builtin_powi, and if we want the strength reduction optimization from comment
#0 a new missed-optimization PR should be filed against the middle-e
--- Comment #6 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-02 16:21 ---
Subject: Bug 32239
Author: jb
Date: Mon Jul 2 16:21:37 2007
New Revision: 126215
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126215
Log:
Forgot to delete these during yesterdays commit.
2007-07-02 Janne Blo
--- Comment #5 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-01 16:24 ---
Subject: Bug 32239
Author: jb
Date: Sun Jul 1 16:24:38 2007
New Revision: 126175
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126175
Log:
gcc/fortran:
2007-07-01 Janne Blomqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-25 19:52 ---
"At the moment the vectorizer only vectorizes builtin_pow if the exponent is
either 2 or 0.5. whereas if we expand constant exponents in the gfortran
frontend (gfc_conv_cst_int_power) it vectorizes for other constant
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-06-17 11:40 ---
Subject: Bug number PR32239
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-06/msg01172.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #2 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-17 06:39 ---
Assigning to myself, this should be easy to fix.
--
jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-08 10:11 ---
Confirmed. Instead of calls to _gfortran_pow_r4_i4, gfortran should use
__builtin_powi in this case. __builtin_powi is either expanded inline or
implemented by the libgcc powi function which looks like
TYPE
NAME (
