--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-21 14:16 ---
Subject: Bug 31867
Author: pault
Date: Mon May 21 13:16:06 2007
New Revision: 124903
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124903
Log:
2007-05-21 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #10 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-05-15 13:40 ---
Subject: Bug number PR31867
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00961.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-15 10:56 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> The patch below works and regtests OK.
I told a lie - the version that regtests OK has the line
+ if (!integer_onep (info->stride[dim]))
+ stride_ne_one = 1;
a b
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 20:51 ---
The patch below works and regtests OK. I am not convince that this is the
whole story and need to think about it for a day or two.
Paul
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
==
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-11 13:13 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> So I suspect that the problem lies in the interfacing around
> gfc_conv_function_call but I just don't see it yet.
Indeed this is the case:
In Tobias' #5, changing the declaration for 'wor
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-11 12:09 ---
This gives the correct result:
pure integer function lensum (words, sep)
character (len=*), intent(in):: words(:), sep
lensum = (size (words)-1) * len (sep) + sum (len_trim (words))
end function
module ut
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-10 12:34 ---
Reduced test case, which gives still the same valgrind error. In addition,
len(join(words)) should give 8 not 10.
Using "len=5" instead of "len=*" or "words(2)" instead of "words(:) fixes both.
(=> "8" and no valgrin
--- Comment #4 from beliavsky at aol dot com 2007-05-09 15:27 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I get:
> words = 'two three'
> On x86-64-gnu/linux with latest 4.3
> I wonder if this is one that we recently fixed. Can you try with a more
> recent
> build?
Using Mingw 20070506, the probl
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-09 07:33 ---
valgrind shows:
==7067== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==7067==at 0x5603550: write (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==7067==by 0x4EC1130: do_write (unix.c:336)
==7067==by 0x4EC11D1: fd_
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-09 01:33
---
I get:
words = 'two three'
On x86-64-gnu/linux with latest 4.3
I wonder if this is one that we recently fixed. Can you try with a more recent
build?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31867
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-09 01:10
---
I will look this over tonight.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31867
11 matches
Mail list logo
