--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-08 15:41 ---
Subject: Bug 31630
Author: pault
Date: Tue May 8 14:40:58 2007
New Revision: 124550
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124550
Log:
2007-05-08 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-05-03 18:37 ---
Subject: Bug number PR31630
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00116.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-23 17:52 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-23 16:14 ---
Subject: Bug 31630
Author: pault
Date: Mon Apr 23 16:13:48 2007
New Revision: 124069
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124069
Log:
2007-04-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-19 06:32 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Move use sort_box_module up to module level and it compiles fine. This is yet
another derived type association regression that I would swear is identical to
one of the testcases:)
It's mine.
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-18 22:40
---
It's a 4.3 regression, because it compiles with 4.2 (although I haven't looked
at the generated code).
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-