--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-13 12:37 ---
Close as FIXED, if it reappears, please reopen it.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-13 12:26 ---
Subject: Bug 31562
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Apr 13 12:26:09 2007
New Revision: 123784
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123784
Log:
2007-04-13 Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortr
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-13 11:59 ---
Subject: Bug 31562
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Apr 13 11:59:19 2007
New Revision: 123780
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123780
Log:
2007-04-12 Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortr
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-13 11:46
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> f2c conventions use whatever the system uses as a complex type. How that
> should be represented in C, I have no idea.
OK, so that means gfortran.dg/f2c_4.c should be fixed in the same
--- Comment #4 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-13 11:43 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> PS: a grep indicates that gfortran.dg/f2c_4.c is the only other test that
> might
> have the same problem, but I've never seen it fail. I wonder if complex should
> be passed as struct with f
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-13 11:10
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The modified test works at least with -O0, both 32bit and 64bit.
Thanks for reporting and testing, Andreas! Tobias, your patch is OK, you can go
ahead and commit it.
PS: a grep indicat
--- Comment #2 from schwab at suse dot de 2007-04-13 11:01 ---
The modified test works at least with -O0, both 32bit and 64bit.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31562
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-13 10:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=13362)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13362&action=view)
change struct complex into "complex float" in gfortran.dg/value_4.c
Does the attached test-case patch work? As I
