http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31059
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Franke 2010-12-29
15:22:47 UTC ---
*** Bug 34741 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31059
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Franke 2010-12-29
15:22:44 UTC ---
*** Bug 32454 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-23 16:16 ---
Aren't PR32454 and PR34741 duplicates of this also?
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 19:19 ---
*** Bug 39994 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last recon
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 21:18
---
I don't think it's a duplicate, and I don't think it has anything to do with
allocatable either:
$ cat b.f90
subroutine foo(n)
integer, allocatable :: ivec(:)
integer :: jvec(n)
allocate (ivec(n))
ivec =
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-07 07:23 ---
Confirmed, gfortran should print something like:
"Rank 1 of array operand has extent 2 instead of 3"
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30802 ***
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
