[Bug fortran/30933] intrinsic: EXIT

2007-08-06 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 22:44 --- Subject: Bug 30933 Author: fxcoudert Date: Mon Aug 6 22:44:27 2007 New Revision: 127257 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127257 Log: PR fortran/30933 * intrinsic.c (add_fun

[Bug fortran/30933] intrinsic: EXIT

2007-08-06 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 22:29 --- Last bit fixed. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added S

[Bug fortran/30933] intrinsic: EXIT

2007-08-06 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 22:29 --- Subject: Bug 30933 Author: fxcoudert Date: Mon Aug 6 22:29:24 2007 New Revision: 127256 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127256 Log: PR fortran/30933 * iresolve.c (gfc_resol

[Bug fortran/30933] intrinsic: EXIT

2007-03-31 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 18:34 --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Mar 31 18:30:11 2007 New Revision: 123385 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123385 Log: 2007-03-31 Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * intrinsic.c (add_functions

[Bug fortran/30933] intrinsic: EXIT

2007-03-13 Thread brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-14 04:47 --- The "above commit" is obviously missing; I typoed the PR number when making it. Here's the info: Author: brooks Date: Wed Mar 14 04:38:47 2007 New Revision: 122905 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&

[Bug fortran/30933] intrinsic: EXIT

2007-03-13 Thread brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-14 04:45 --- The above commit fixes the documentation to document that only default integer arguments are allowed. I left the argument name as "STATUS", because "COUNT" seems absurd and in this case I think it's clear that we wan

[Bug fortran/30933] intrinsic: EXIT

2007-02-23 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-02-23 18:05 --- Subject: Bug number PR30933 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01902.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug fortran/30933] intrinsic: EXIT

2007-02-23 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug fortran/30933] intrinsic: EXIT

2007-02-22 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 00:38 --- The documentation states: > Arguments: > STATUS The type of the argument shall be INTEGER(*). but arguments of kind INTEGER(kind=1) and INTEGER(kind=2) may lead to unresolved symbols (see also comment #3). -

[Bug fortran/30933] intrinsic: EXIT

2007-02-22 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 00:21 --- A note on the testcase: gfortran seems to resolve EXIT only once. If CALL exit() CALL exit(int_1) gfortran happily compiles and links. If CALL exit(int_1) CALL exit() then /tmp/ccuE9OGi.o: In function `MAI

[Bug fortran/30933] intrinsic: EXIT

2007-02-22 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-22 23:40 --- Created an attachment (id=13094) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13094&action=view) testcase (dg-do link) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30933

[Bug fortran/30933] intrinsic: EXIT

2007-02-22 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-22 23:40 --- Created an attachment (id=13093) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13093&action=view) testcase (dg-do compile) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30933