--- Comment #5 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 16:26 ---
fortran seems to bootstrap now.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 07:19 ---
Subject: Bug 30549
Author: pault
Date: Tue Jan 23 07:19:26 2007
New Revision: 121080
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121080
Log:
2007-01-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 06:26 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> > No, that means it is used possiable as null.
> > You need to check inside pure_function to see if there is a way that the
> > second argument does not get initialized.
>
> There is:
> i
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-22 22:25 ---
> No, that means it is used possiable as null.
> You need to check inside pure_function to see if there is a way that the
> second argument does not get initialized.
There is:
if (e->symtree != NULL
&& e->
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-22 22:14 ---
Can you try after:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-01/msg00765.html
?
>and later used without extra if(name) in:
No, that means it is used possiable as null.
You need to check inside pure_function to see if ther
