--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-05 19:45 ---
Subject: Bug 30003
Author: pault
Date: Tue Dec 5 19:45:25 2006
New Revision: 119556
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119556
Log:
2006-12-05 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-12-05 16:45 ---
Subject: Bug number PR30003
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg00306.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #7 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-05 15:57 ---
Thanks Paul and Erik!
The patch regtests fine on i686-darwin together with my patch to enable
bounds-checking in the testsuite (and the workaround for PR29516, without which
gfortran is essentially unusable on i686-dar
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-05 15:07 ---
> Patch and testcase for the PR
> This regtests OK on Cygwin_NT/PIV. I will submit it tonight.
It also regression tests ok on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu; the patch itself also
looks ok.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-05 09:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=12746)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12746&action=view)
Patch and testcase for the PR
This regtests OK on Cygwin_NT/PIV. I will submit it tonight.
Paul
--
pault at
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-05 08:25 ---
Duuuhhh!
> Erik, if you have a moment, could you see if you can understand where the
> extra free comes from?
That was the whole point, wasn't it? :-)
So the full patch will modify allocatable_function_1.f90 to expe
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-04 22:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=12744)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12744&action=view)
A fix for this PR
This is most of the way there, using the idea in #2; except that, for reasons I
do not understa
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-04 20:47 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I thought I would have time to do something about this bug, but I will not;
> not
> in the next few weeks/months. I therefore unassign it from me. My appologies
> to those who expected to
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-02 22:28
---
I thought I would have time to do something about this bug, but I will not; not
in the next few weeks/months. I therefore unassign it from me. My appologies
to those who expected to be fixed soon.
If it's still
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirme
10 matches
Mail list logo
