[Bug fortran/29677] minimally informative gfortran -fbounds-check

2006-11-15 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-16 07:51 --- Closing, since this was already fixed. Please reopen (or open a new report) if you have another example of such behaviour with an up-to-date compiler. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: W

[Bug fortran/29677] minimally informative gfortran -fbounds-check

2006-11-01 Thread tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
--- Comment #4 from tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de 2006-11-01 14:01 --- This has been fixed in the meanwhile. (Don't forget, gfortran is not that old.) Possibilities: - Use a GCC 4.1 branch build (newer than 4.1.1) - Use a GCC 4.2 branch build - Use a GCC 4.3 trunk bu

[Bug fortran/29677] minimally informative gfortran -fbounds-check

2006-10-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-31 21:48 --- *** Bug 29678 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29677

[Bug fortran/29677] minimally informative gfortran -fbounds-check

2006-10-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-31 21:41 --- The other thing is with debugging option such as -fbounds-check, you can also use gdb to figure out which one. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29677

[Bug fortran/29677] minimally informative gfortran -fbounds-check

2006-10-31 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-31 21:38 --- Upgrade to the a 4.2 pre-release version of gfortran or the mainline version. Please report back if you find a problem. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Ad