--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-29 08:51 ---
Closing.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #12 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-29 07:44 ---
Jakub, I think this PR is fixed and can be closed. The remaining issue (ld or
gcc bug) is tracked in PR 40040. Can we close it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29635
--- Comment #11 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-10 21:38
---
Jakub, is anything left to do? Can this one be closed?
How about PR24526, is this fixed as well?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29635
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-29 18:42 ---
Subject: Bug 29635
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Aug 29 18:41:19 2008
New Revision: 139773
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139773
Log:
PR fortran/29635
PR fortran/23057
* debu
--- Comment #9 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-18 12:38 ---
Interesting, I didn't know this was for the benefit of some debugger. I don't
think GDB has needed it in several years. If things work with GDB 6.8 and
without these DIEs, I think it's safe to combine the declaration
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-18 08:43 ---
Looking at the original namespace support in dwarf2out patches I found the
declaration in the namespace and specification in CU is being done for
compatibility with (at that time) existing debuggers. I'm not sure if w
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-18 08:11 ---
To expand on the duplicate DIE issue in C++, say:
namespace N
{
int i;
}
int foo ()
{
using N::i;
return i;
}
emits:
.uleb128 0x3# (DIE (0x55) DW_TAG_imported_declaration)
.byte 0x1 # DW
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-15 20:19 ---
*** Bug 37133 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-15 18:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=16077)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16077&action=view)
gcc44-pr29635.patch
Initial patch, which generates DW_TAG_module in the compilation unit that
defines
the module
--- Comment #4 from stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com 2007-08-12 10:36
---
Subject: Re: debug info of modules
This is still on my TODO-list, but not for GCC 4.3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29635
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-11 22:08 ---
gfortran seems to lack the following information:
1. DW_TAG_module
to describe the module at hand
2. DW_TAG_imported_declaration/DW_TAG_imported_module/DW_AT_import
to describe use-associated variables (dw
--- Comment #2 from stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com 2007-01-02 15:27
---
Subject: Re: debug info of modules
I'm waiting for my gdb assignment to be finished. This will probably
be work for Q2 2007.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29635
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-02 14:35
---
Steven, any news from your Fortran debug info work?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29635
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |steven at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
14 matches
Mail list logo