[Bug fortran/29284] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE for optional subroutine argument

2006-10-24 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-24 08:06 --- Subject: Bug 29284 Author: fxcoudert Date: Tue Oct 24 08:05:55 2006 New Revision: 117996 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117996 Log: A bunch of backports: PR fortran/29284

[Bug fortran/29284] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE for optional subroutine argument

2006-10-03 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 20:16 --- Fixed on trunk Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug fortran/29284] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE for optional subroutine argument

2006-10-03 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 20:13 --- Subject: Bug 29284 Author: pault Date: Tue Oct 3 20:13:03 2006 New Revision: 117413 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117413 Log: 2006-10-03 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/29284] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE for optional subroutine argument

2006-10-01 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29284

[Bug fortran/29284] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE for optional subroutine argument

2006-10-01 Thread paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
--- Comment #5 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-10-01 19:59 --- Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE for optional subroutine argument Dear All, >PS: Just curious.. >Why isn't this part of gfc_conv_function_call() coded to check for fsym once >and only then have the additional

[Bug fortran/29284] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE for optional subroutine argument

2006-10-01 Thread rep dot nop at aon dot at
--- Comment #4 from rep dot nop at aon dot at 2006-10-01 15:28 --- Note that i don't think i can approve anything. This patch fixes the following ICE for me: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-09/msg00460.html $ cat no.f90 MODULE MOD1 CONTAINS SUBROUTINE SUB1(ar

[Bug fortran/29284] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE for optional subroutine argument

2006-10-01 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-10-01 13:45 --- Subject: Bug number PR29284 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00011.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug fortran/29284] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE for optional subroutine argument

2006-10-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-01 09:23 --- Created an attachment (id=12364) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12364&action=view) Fix for this problem This seems to be my doing - I forgot all about missing optionals when I introduced this test

[Bug fortran/29284] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE for optional subroutine argument

2006-09-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-29 08:20 --- 4.1.2 20060917 also fails. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added