--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-02 14:55
---
Type-checking is now in mainline, and PR31608 is tracking the last remaining
failure exposed in the testsuite. Closing this PR.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-24 16:03 ---
None of the testcases in comment #3 fail on the mainline configured with
--enable-checking=yes,types. So either this bug is fixed or the patches from
Andrew did some slightly different checking. Or both ;)
--
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-10 09:28 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Tobi,
> (trans-expr.c:141) which looks like it gets the types right. Replacing the
> call to fold_convert with an equivalent call to build_int_cst doesn't help
> either, BTW.
Does casting th
--- Comment #6 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-21 15:04 ---
I don't understand why it fails in the fourth case. The comparison it seems to
complain about is generated via
return build2 (NE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, decl,
fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (decl), null_po
--- Comment #5 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-21 14:54 ---
Behavior is different with today's mainline on i386-darwin.
Without optimization the first one gives an error further down the line, and
the other three pass:
1.f90:3: internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at si
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-30 08:30
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> real c
> if (loc(c) == 0) call abort
> end
This one has been fixed on mainline.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-02 15:24
---
Here's a detailed analysis of the current testsuite failures with Andrew's
patches from PR22368 (all patches applied) on i686-linux.
First testcase (from actual_array_constructor_1.f90):
subroutine bar(a)
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 19:13 ---
This happens when the first patch in PR 22368 is added.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 18:28 ---
Andrew,
How, when and where does this happen, please?
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28722
