--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 18:13 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 18:09 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28496
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 28496
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/28
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 05:46 ---
Subject: Bug 28496
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 05:45:43 2006
New Revision: 116268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116268
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/28
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-08-10 10:15 ---
Subject: Bug number PR28496
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00305.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #4 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-08-10
07:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=12054)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12054&action=view)
Patch to fix the PR and a testcase
This seems to do the trick. I will regtest and submit to the li
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 04:56 ---
I can see what the problem is - when I wrote this section of code in expr.c, I
did the conditions for "step" and "finish" correctly but for "begin", I wrote:
/* Obtain the start value for the index. */
if
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-26 19:52
---
gfortran 4.0 series is seriously broken and shouldn't be considered for
production use. Indeed, your testcase and variations work with the gfortran 4.2
branch, except for the following:
$ cat a.f90
integer,
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-26 19:15 ---
First, you'll want to upgrade to at least 4.1.1 form 4.0.2.
Second, yes, it appears to be a bug. These lines work as expected.
integer, dimension(6), parameter :: y=(/ a(1:3), b(1:3) /)
integer, dimension(6), parame
