[Bug fortran/28276] EXPONENT() broken for real constants

2006-09-27 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-27 20:38 --- Fixed on trunk. Won't be fixed on 4.1. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/28276] EXPONENT() broken for real constants

2006-09-27 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-27 20:15 --- Subject: Bug 28276 Author: kargl Date: Wed Sep 27 20:15:22 2006 New Revision: 117257 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117257 Log: * configure.in: Check for GMP 4.1 or newer. Check for MP

[Bug fortran/28276] EXPONENT() broken for real constants

2006-09-11 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Comment #8 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-09-11 20:31 --- Subject: Re: EXPONENT() broken for real constants On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 07:33:35PM -, sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu wrote: > > I should also note that the parsing is corre

[Bug fortran/28276] EXPONENT() broken for real constants

2006-09-11 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Comment #7 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-09-11 19:33 --- Subject: Re: EXPONENT() broken for real constants On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 07:19:41PM -, sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu wrote: > > gfortran is calling the wrong libm function.

[Bug fortran/28276] EXPONENT() broken for real constants

2006-09-11 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Comment #6 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-09-11 19:19 --- Subject: Re: EXPONENT() broken for real constants On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 10:43:21PM -, tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de wrote: > > Comment #5 from tobias dot burnus at physik

[Bug fortran/28276] EXPONENT() broken for real constants

2006-09-10 Thread tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
--- Comment #5 from tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de 2006-09-10 22:43 --- > Can you try this patch? It required MPFR 2.2.0. Tested on openSUSE/AMD64 with current gfortran trunk + patch and mpfr-2.2.0-9. It works ok with kind = 4 and kind = 8. However, with kind = 10 I

[Bug fortran/28276] EXPONENT() broken for real constants

2006-07-17 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Comment #4 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-07-17 18:11 --- Subject: Re: EXPONENT() broken for real constants On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 05:54:46PM -, tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de wrote: > > I see the same problem for real(8) and for

[Bug fortran/28276] EXPONENT() broken for real constants

2006-07-17 Thread tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
--- Comment #3 from tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de 2006-07-17 17:54 --- (CC myself) I see the same problem for real(8) and for real(10) as for real = real(4), except for print *, scale (fraction (a), exponent (a)) / a where I get "NaN" with real(10) instead of t

[Bug fortran/28276] EXPONENT() broken for real constants

2006-07-06 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3 |P1 http:/

[Bug fortran/28276] EXPONENT() broken for real constants

2006-07-05 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-05 21:53 --- Confirmed. I have a patch, but it may depend on MPFR 2.2.0. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/28276] EXPONENT() broken for real constants

2006-07-05 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2006-07-05 20:01 --- Created an attachment (id=11838) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11838&action=view) Example code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28276