--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 19:52 ---
Fixed in trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 19:51 ---
Subject: Bug 27411
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 28 19:50:51 2006
New Revision: 114174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114174
Log:
2006-05-28 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 19:47 ---
Subject: Bug 27411
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 28 19:46:22 2006
New Revision: 114173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114173
Log:
2006-05-28 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #8 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-05-18 20:03 ---
Subject: Re: crashes in sra_walk_expr and emit_move_insn
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>--- Comment #7 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-18 16:36 ---
>Paul, you didn't ask yourself to the CC ls
--- Comment #7 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-18 16:36 ---
Paul, you didn't ask yourself to the CC lsit, so you missed Volker's comments.
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-18 10:08
---
Btw, you also added the wrong PR number for PR 18003 in the ChangeLog entries
and the testcase (namely PR18803), would you mind fixing this as well?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27411
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-18 10:04
---
Paul, in your patch, you added the wrong PR number (PR24711 instead of
PR27411).
Would you mind changing the ChangeLog entries?
Are you going to fix this bug on the 4.1 branch, too, or can we close the PR?
--
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:35 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27411
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00252.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #3 from paul dot thomas at jet dot uk 2006-05-05 06:26 ---
The patch below fixes the problem by enclosing the expression for the array
reference outputs%signal_number in parentheses(You can verify that this does
the right thing by doing it explicitly in the fortran.). This t
--- Comment #2 from paul dot thomas at jet dot uk 2006-05-04 09:50 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Confirmed, this is a front-end issue.
> we have:
> struct calc_signal_type D.904;
> D.904 = (*(struct calc_signal_type[0:] *)
> outputs->data)[outputs->dim[0].stride
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-04 04:50 ---
Confirmed, this is a front-end issue.
we have:
struct calc_signal_type D.904;
D.904 = (*(struct calc_signal_type[0:] *)
outputs->data)[outputs->dim[0].stride * NON_LVALUE_EXPR ];
11 matches
Mail list logo
