--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 05:02 ---
Subject: Bug 27269
Author: pault
Date: Mon May 8 05:01:56 2006
New Revision: 113618
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113618
Log:
2006-05-08 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-05-02 14:24 ---
This should now be fixed on mainline, thanks to Paul's patch.
--
roger at eyesopen dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #4 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 14:13 ---
Subject: Bug 27269
Author: sayle
Date: Tue May 2 14:13:17 2006
New Revision: 113465
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113465
Log:
2006-05-02 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/27
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-04-28 09:15 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27269
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg01079.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Comment #2 from paul dot thomas at jet dot uk 2006-04-26 14:09 ---
The testcase reduces to:
module a
integer, parameter :: dp = kind (1d0)
real(dp) :: reM, M
equivalence (M, reM)
end module a
module b
use a, only : dp
end module b
use a
use b
print *, M
reM = 0.5d1
--- Comment #1 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 11:45 ---
Since I still have it on my screen:
(gdb) p eq->expr->where->nextc-18
$6 = 0x8708de9 " use cross_section"
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27269
