--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-07 00:18 ---
What do you mean by crash? Aka What is the error you get?
Also this source is no where near compilable by itself because of the includes.
Also what is the exact version of GCC you are using? (use gcc -v to get th
--- Comment #5 from nuno dot bandeira at ist dot utl dot pt 2006-04-07
00:10 ---
Subject: Re: -ffast-math crash
jvdelisle at verizon dot net wrote:
>
> -ffast-math is uncertain, not related to gfortran.
I notice speedups of up to 50% for my binary at the cost of some
numerical err
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-07 00:07 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
>
> kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>> Don't use --fast-math.
>
> Is there a valid reason for it or is the implementation of the
> -ffast-math still uncertain ?
>
Does your code work c
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2006-04-07 00:06 ---
Subject: Re: -ffast-math crash
nuno dot bandeira at ist dot utl dot pt wrote:
> --- Comment #2 from nuno dot bandeira at ist dot utl dot pt 2006-04-06
> 23:56 ---
> Subject: Re: -ffast-math crash
>
> karg
nuno dot bandeira at ist dot utl dot pt wrote:
--- Comment #2 from nuno dot bandeira at ist dot utl dot pt 2006-04-06
23:56 ---
Subject: Re: -ffast-math crash
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-06 23:47 ---
Don't us
--- Comment #2 from nuno dot bandeira at ist dot utl dot pt 2006-04-06
23:56 ---
Subject: Re: -ffast-math crash
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-06 23:47 ---
> Don't use --fast-math.
Is there a valid reason for i
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-06 23:47 ---
Don't use --fast-math.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27069
