--- Comment #9 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-19 17:23
---
Subject: Bug 26201
Author: eedelman
Date: Sun Feb 19 17:23:07 2006
New Revision: 111270
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111270
Log:
fortran/
2006-02-19 Erik Edelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-02-18 23:54 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 regression] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 07:52:27PM -, eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
>
>
> Index: gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
> ===
--- Comment #7 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 19:52
---
Here's a small one-liner patch that I think fixes the bug. I'll post it to the
mailing list later tonight if/when it passes regression testing.
Index: gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
=
--- Comment #6 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-16 14:12
---
With Philippe's testcase, I can reproduce the problem on my system now.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #5 from P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de
2006-02-16 14:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=10862)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10862&action=view)
Sources which exhibit this behaviour (under 32-bit linux)
Hi!
Here's something that exhibit
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last recon
--- Comment #4 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-02-15 21:30 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 regression] __convert_i4_i8 written to a module.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 09:20:15PM -, eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
>
> I can't reproduce the problem with MUMP
--- Comment #3 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-15 21:20
---
I can't reproduce the problem with MUMPS on Linux/x86 (mainline revision
11, 4.1 revision 110989). Assuming that Steve used a 64 bit processor, it
seems that for this code the bug is visible only on 64 bit sys
