https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25391
Bug 25391 depends on bug 25708, which changed state.
Bug 25708 Summary: [F95] Module loading is not good at all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25708
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25391
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 25391
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 12:18 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 25391
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 07:05 ---
Subject: Bug 25391
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 22 07:05:22 2005
New Revision: 108943
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108943
Log:
2005-12-22 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 16:47 ---
Yes, your patch fixes this (perhaps you can also add this testcase into your
patch), thanks.
Your patch looks OK to me, but my OK doesn't count.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25391
--- Comment #1 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2005-12-15
16:21 ---
Jakub,
I believe, but cannot test until tonight, that my patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-12/msg00259.html cures this problem by
checking for host association of the same use associated derived t
