[Bug fortran/25087] Error for missing explicit interface needed.

2006-11-23 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-23 19:17 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.2 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/25087] Error for missing explicit interface needed.

2006-11-23 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-23 19:14 --- Subject: Bug 25087 Author: pault Date: Thu Nov 23 19:14:05 2006 New Revision: 119132 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119132 Log: 2006-11-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/2

[Bug fortran/25087] Error for missing explicit interface needed.

2006-11-15 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug fortran/25087] Error for missing explicit interface needed.

2006-11-15 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-11-15 18:02 --- Subject: Bug number PR25087 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg01058.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug fortran/25087] Error for missing explicit interface needed.

2006-09-28 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-28 11:35 --- There's a TODO about this in front-end resolve.c. It's a good point to start... static void resolve_formal_arglist (gfc_symbol * proc) { gfc_formal_arglist *f; gfc_symbol *sym; int i; /* TODO: Procedures

[Bug fortran/25087] Error for missing explicit interface needed.

2005-11-29 Thread eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-29 12:06 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Reduced testcase: > > SUBROUTINE s(n) > CHARACTER(LEN=n), EXTERNAL :: a > write(6,*) a(n) > END SUBROUTINE s > > The problem, unless I'm missing something, is that the external functi