--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 16:30 ---
Subject: Bug 25031
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Mar 30 16:30:26 2006
New Revision: 112539
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112539
Log:
2006-03-30 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fo
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-23 18:36 ---
There is a problem with the current solution on trunk.
When we do
allocate (a(10))
allocate (a(20),stat=i)
the size information is changed, but the size of the array is not.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-03 16:18 ---
Subject: Bug 25031
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Mar 3 16:18:46 2006
New Revision: 111677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111677
Log:
2006-03-03 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fo
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-28 18:49 ---
This one is a bit tricky, because the code would
be legal (if memory-leaking) for if a were a pointer.
Also, using a stat variable is supposed to catch this.
Seems like we need a new function for allocating allocata
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-25 15:09
---
Confirmed.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
