--- Comment #6 from uttamp at us dot ibm dot com 2006-01-11 22:02 ---
Subject: Re: another runtime error goes undetected
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 09:07 +, pault at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 09:07 ---
> (In repl
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 09:07 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This is not a bug. gfortran behavior is identical to ifort.
>
Actually, it is quite specifically NOT permitted by the standard. To quote
12.4.1.1:
"If a scalar dummy argument is of type de
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 03:25
---
This is not a bug. gfortran behavior is identical to ifort.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24886
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-03 16:59 ---
Not PPC specific.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC build triple
--- Comment #2 from uttamp at us dot ibm dot com 2005-11-16 17:33 ---
Any error which indicates something like, "dummy argument defined to be larger
than actual argument.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24886
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 15:00
---
What kind of runtime error would you think is appropriate? I don't see where
the problem is.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
