[Bug fortran/24807] Fortran supports real*16, but not complex*32

2005-12-01 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-02 01:27 --- Patch applied. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/24807] Fortran supports real*16, but not complex*32

2005-11-22 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-22 08:24 --- (In reply to comment #6) > I've change the error message so that it doesn't use the expression "kind" > where it shouldn't. I also changed the other error message that is a few > lines > further down in the same

[Bug fortran/24807] Fortran supports real*16, but not complex*32

2005-11-19 Thread schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de
--- Comment #6 from schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de 2005-11-19 19:38 --- Created an attachment (id=10295) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10295&action=view) Patch with better error messach I've change the error message so that it doesn't use the expression "kind" wh

[Bug fortran/24807] Fortran supports real*16, but not complex*32

2005-11-19 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 14:51 --- How about "Old style type declaration at %L not supported"? The 16 in complex*16 really isn't a kind type parameter, so we should avoid calling it a kind. If you decide to go with the above message, consider the patch

[Bug fortran/24807] Fortran supports real*16, but not complex*32

2005-11-18 Thread schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de
--- Comment #4 from schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de 2005-11-19 01:16 --- The same error message was already given (a few lines further down) when the kind had an unsupported value. An old style kind is given in a declaration as "real*8", a new style kind as "real(8)". For integer and

[Bug fortran/24807] Fortran supports real*16, but not complex*32

2005-11-18 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 00:14 --- (In reply to comment #1) > The reason of the problem is that the conversion from complex*N to real*M with > N=2M happens only for selected values. The enclosed patch may help. This patch is OK but I don't quite

[Bug fortran/24807] Fortran supports real*16, but not complex*32

2005-11-11 Thread schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de
--- Comment #2 from schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de 2005-11-11 19:06 --- Created an attachment (id=10219) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10219&action=view) Proposed patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24807

[Bug fortran/24807] Fortran supports real*16, but not complex*32

2005-11-11 Thread schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de
--- Comment #1 from schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de 2005-11-11 19:05 --- The reason of the problem is that the conversion from complex*N to real*M with N=2M happens only for selected values. The enclosed patch may help. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24807