--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-02 01:27 ---
Patch applied.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-22 08:24
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I've change the error message so that it doesn't use the expression "kind"
> where it shouldn't. I also changed the other error message that is a few
> lines
> further down in the same
--- Comment #6 from schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de 2005-11-19 19:38
---
Created an attachment (id=10295)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10295&action=view)
Patch with better error messach
I've change the error message so that it doesn't use the expression "kind"
wh
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 14:51 ---
How about "Old style type declaration at %L not supported"?
The 16 in complex*16 really isn't a kind type parameter, so
we should avoid calling it a kind. If you decide to go with
the above message, consider the patch
--- Comment #4 from schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de 2005-11-19 01:16
---
The same error message was already given (a few lines further down) when the
kind had an unsupported value. An old style kind is given in a declaration as
"real*8", a new style kind as "real(8)".
For integer and
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 00:14
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The reason of the problem is that the conversion from complex*N to real*M with
> N=2M happens only for selected values. The enclosed patch may help.
This patch is OK but I don't quite
--- Comment #2 from schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de 2005-11-11 19:06
---
Created an attachment (id=10219)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10219&action=view)
Proposed patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24807
--- Comment #1 from schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de 2005-11-11 19:05
---
The reason of the problem is that the conversion from complex*N to real*M with
N=2M happens only for selected values. The enclosed patch may help.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24807