--- Comment #8 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2005-10-20 01:18 ---
Subject: Re: dimag_ undefined error with -std=f95
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 01:10:06AM -, uttamp at us dot ibm dot com wrote:
>
> Finally I found the f95 standard document (1539-1-1997) and did
--- Comment #7 from uttamp at us dot ibm dot com 2005-10-20 01:10 ---
Finally I found the f95 standard document (1539-1-1997) and did not see dimag()
mentioned in there. I was looking at PGI Fortran Reference document all this
time and there was not comment about dimag() as an extension.
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-19 22:57 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> If the page I pointed to is true, then this is a dup of bug 20248.
>
It not a dup of 20248. The initial discussion there mirrors
this PR, but Harald added in a discussion with regard to t
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-19 22:50 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > dimag is part of the fortran 95 standard, right?
> >
> > If not this is not a bug (or really a dup another one which says that
> > gfortran
> > is not constaina
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-19 22:35 ---
If the page I pointed to is true, then this is a dup of bug 20248.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24447
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-19 22:32 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Yes, dimag is part of fortran95.
Are you sure?
because http://www.nag.co.uk/nagware/NP/doc/faq.asp
says it is not and that AIMAG is though.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Comment #2 from uttamp at us dot ibm dot com 2005-10-19 22:25 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> dimag is part of the fortran 95 standard, right?
>
> If not this is not a bug (or really a dup another one which says that gfortran
> is not constainate with other fortran compilers with int
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-19 22:21 ---
dimag is part of the fortran 95 standard, right?
If not this is not a bug (or really a dup another one which says that gfortran
is not constainate with other fortran compilers with intrinsics).
--
http://gcc.gn
