[Bug fortran/23254] gfortran .f90 complex parameter initialization syntax bug

2005-08-06 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2005-08-06 16:03 --- Subject: Re: gfortran .f90 complex parameter initialization syntax bug On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 03:02:37PM -, christopherbuell at mindspring dot com wrote: > > (In reply to comment #3

[Bug fortran/23254] gfortran .f90 complex parameter initialization syntax bug

2005-08-06 Thread christopherbuell at mindspring dot com
--- Additional Comments From christopherbuell at mindspring dot com 2005-08-06 15:02 --- (In reply to comment #3) Got it. I don't know the F90 or F95 standard very well. I do know F77. The code I was porting did compile on the MS-DEC FORTRAN 95 compiler. (whoever owns that compiler anyw

[Bug fortran/23254] gfortran .f90 complex parameter initialization syntax bug

2005-08-05 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-06 02:38 --- gfortran is doing the right thing according to section 7.1.6.1 of the Fortran 95 standard. For completeness, here is the output of NAGWare F95 compiler. kargl[204] f95 -kind=byte -c lk.f90 Error: lk.f90, lin

[Bug fortran/23254] gfortran .f90 complex parameter initialization syntax bug

2005-08-05 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-05 22:52 --- The code appears to be illegal. Lahey reports Compiling program unit consts_test at line 1: 1034-S: "SOURCE.F90", line 10: Right parenthesis missing or position of right parenthesis invalid. 1034-S: "SOU

[Bug fortran/23254] gfortran .f90 complex parameter initialization syntax bug

2005-08-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-05 20:35 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E