--- Comment #12 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-06-29 21:41 ---
Subject: Bug number PR22038
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg01238.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:12 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:08 ---
Subject: Bug 22038
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jun 25 18:08:13 2006
New Revision: 114994
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114994
Log:
2006-06-25 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 15:11 ---
Subject: Bug 22038
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jun 25 15:11:02 2006
New Revision: 114987
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114987
Log:
2006-06-25 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-09 00:34 ---
Reopening since the testcase has been xfailed IIRC.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-06 20:44 ---
Are you sure? forall_8.f90 testcase still fails for me with gfortran
as of a few days ago.
If the problem is fixed and the testcases aren't invalid, they should be
added to the testsuite, otherwise this needs to be re
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-06 20:33 ---
This one was fixed a long time since but does not seem to have been cleared.
The recent flurry of activity on the dependency checking has made keeping it
open unnecessary IMHO.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot or
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 19:02
---
The commit fixes only a small part of the issues, namely those which made
gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90 fail. There remain several issues as explained here
together with a patch for some of them:
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13
18:30 ---
Subject: Bug 22038
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-13 18:30:15
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13
18:23 ---
Subject: Bug 22038
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-13 18:23:46
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: ChangeLog trans-stmt.c
gcc/t
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-06-
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 15:50
---
A patch which fixes the testcase is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-06/msg00138.html
Further fixes to FORALL here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-06/msg00166.html
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 15:43
---
Discussed in this thread: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-06/msg00101.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22038
13 matches
Mail list logo
