--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-27
15:44 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-27
15:43 ---
Subject: Bug 21177
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-27 15:42:54
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-27
15:38 ---
Subject: Bug 21177
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-27 15:37:55
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: ChangeLog interface.c
gcc/te
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25
13:31 ---
Patch was posted.
--
What|Removed |Added
URL||htt
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-24
13:06 ---
Found a patch (after a good night's sleep, it seemed to easy!):
Instead of
if (actual->expr_type != EXPR_NULL
&& !gfc_compare_types (&formal->ts, &actual->ts))
return 0;
we need to use
if (
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-24
10:59 ---
This test was introduced to fix PR 12841. Something more subtle is needed
(maybe, check not only for EXPR_NULL, but for EXPR_NULL with no type?).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21177
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23
22:07 ---
In interface.c, we use compare_parameter to match an actual argument to
one of the formal arguments. The type is used to determine which member
of the interface (tt_r or tt_i) we will call.
Unfortunately,
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23
15:20 ---
Confirmed, the real version is being called for both of the NULL()'s.
--
What|Removed |Added
