--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Last reconfirmed|2005-04-23 14:53:37 |2005-07-23 02:25:09
date|
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 14:53
---
Ugh, excuse me. I must have had tomatos on my eyes, as we say in German.
Thanks.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2005-04-23 14:41
---
> The associated actual argument is indeed an external
> procedure
TT is an internal procedure ... (CONTAINS ... SUBROUTINE TT ... END)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20861
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 14:19
---
I still don't get it. The associated actual argument is indeed an external
procedure, so I don't see how internal procedures not being mentioned in the
first phrase makes a difference. Just to make sure the d
--- Additional Comments From jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2005-04-23 14:06
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> >>Any pointers as to why this is invalid?
> >
> > 12.4.1.2
> >
> Hm, I can't see that there. Looks like I'll have to find out which term has
a
> definition different from what I'm
--- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot
uni-muenchen dot de 2005-04-23 13:48 ---
Subject: Re: error needed
>>Any pointers as to why this is invalid?
>
> 12.4.1.2
>
Hm, I can't see that there. Looks like I'll have to find out which term has a
definition diffe
--- Additional Comments From jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2005-04-23 13:36
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Any pointers as to why this is invalid?
12.4.1.2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20861
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-22 14:36
---
Any pointers as to why this is invalid?
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|
