--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20244
--- Comment #17 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 20244
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #16 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:10 ---
fixed on trunk and 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Sta
--- Comment #15 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 20244
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 07:05 ---
Subject: Bug 20244
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 22 07:05:22 2005
New Revision: 108943
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108943
Log:
2005-12-22 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #13 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2005-12-13
12:50 ---
I am just now posting a patch for this bug.
Andrew,
I ignored your advice, "All of the above need to be fixed in the front-end and
not in the middle-end where fold_convert resides." by doing the fixing
--- Comment #12 from dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com 2005-11-17 17:30
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > I got the same ICE with one of the SPEC2006 candidate benchmarks on
> > x86_64-linux-gnu.
>
> Was this before or after my fix for PR 18157 went in? Bec
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 15:24
---
*** Bug 24887 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #10 from aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-13 08:03 ---
I haven't tested SPEC for some time, so cannot tell when this happened first,
the error is in current GCC with your patch applied.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20244
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 23:43 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I got the same ICE with one of the SPEC2006 candidate benchmarks on
> x86_64-linux-gnu.
Was this before or after my fix for PR 18157 went in? Because this and that
bug had the same ICE bu
--- Comment #8 from aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 12:26 ---
I got the same ICE with one of the SPEC2006 candidate benchmarks on
x86_64-linux-gnu.
--
aj at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #7 from anglade at gmail dot com 2005-11-04 15:31 ---
I've simplified to it's (almost) simplest expression the test case:
module mtyp
type t1
integer::a
end type t1
end module mtyp
module atest
use mtyp
type(t1)::ze
contains
subroutine test(ze_in )
use mtyp
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 14:59 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Oh and one more thing, the use of fold_convert is not the incorrect thing to do
here.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20244
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 14:58 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Unfortunately I'm not a gcc expert and really don't know how this should be
> bug-fixed.
The way this bug needs to be fixed is one of the following:
1. the types generated need to be in th
--- Comment #4 from anglade at gmail dot com 2005-11-04 14:54 ---
Hi all,
Looking at the examples of failure due to this bug, I've observed that they are
due to user defined datatype. The function fold_convert seems to handle only
intrinsic datatypes while the examples were using user
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 14:26 ---
*** Bug 24673 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-24 16:53 ---
*** Bug 24504 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-28
13:26 ---
Just a note the following version means something different:
gcc version 3.5.0 20040824 (experimental) (g95!) Dec 20 2004
That is g95 which is a different project from gfortran.
Confirmed, hmm, someone for
18 matches
Mail list logo
