[Bug fortran/19334] ISHFT has the wrong type for constant values

2005-01-09 Thread Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
--- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2005-01-09 15:36 --- Subject: Re: ISHFT has the wrong type for constant values pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-09 > 15:2

[Bug fortran/19334] ISHFT has the wrong type for constant values

2005-01-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-09 15:29 --- int1 C.454 = 0_S8; The 8 is where the problem is, it is just plainly wrong, it should be 1. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19334

[Bug fortran/19334] ISHFT has the wrong type for constant values

2005-01-09 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-09 12:30 --- also, I'm on i686, which could be making a difference even though it shouldn't at this stage. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19334

[Bug fortran/19334] ISHFT has the wrong type for constant values

2005-01-09 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-09 12:29 --- Hm, I've instrumented the tree-dumper to print the widths and signednesses of integer constants, i.e. Index: tree-pretty-print.c === RCS file: /c

[Bug fortran/19334] ISHFT has the wrong type for constant values

2005-01-09 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-09 11:56 --- Is the reduced testcase also not fixed by the patch, or is this a new issue? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19334

[Bug fortran/19334] ISHFT has the wrong type for constant values

2005-01-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-09 02:16 --- nope, this patch did not fix it. -- What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch

[Bug fortran/19334] ISHFT has the wrong type for constant values

2005-01-08 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-08 20:47 --- Created an attachment (id=7906) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7906&action=view) Putative patch 2005-01-08 Tobias Schl"uter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/19334 * trans-

[Bug fortran/19334] ISHFT has the wrong type for constant values

2005-01-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-08 20:33 --- Oh, one more thing from PR 19335, -fmerge-constants is what causes it to fail. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19334

[Bug fortran/19334] ISHFT has the wrong type for constant values

2005-01-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-08 20:32 --- *** Bug 19335 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/19334] ISHFT has the wrong type for constant values

2005-01-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-08 20:06 --- This is just a reduction of the "gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-bit.f" test. reference testresults (not from me): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-01/msg00348.html -- What|Removed