--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18197
--- Comment #12 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-17 19:55
---
*** Bug 25262 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #11 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-17 19:51
---
Fixed on 4.1 and mainline.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-16 18:54
---
Subject: Bug 18197
Author: eedelman
Date: Fri Dec 16 18:54:33 2005
New Revision: 108667
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108667
Log:
fortran/
2005-12-14 Erik Edelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 00:47
---
Subject: Bug 18197
Author: eedelman
Date: Thu Dec 15 00:47:13 2005
New Revision: 108555
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108555
Log:
fortran/
2005-12-14 Erik Edelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from jpr at csc dot fi 2005-12-14 06:51 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > Working on a patch.
>
> Posted a pacth here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-12/msg00116.html
>
Is anyone considering approving (or disapproving) Eriks patch? It would
--- Comment #7 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-06 19:38
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Working on a patch.
Posted a pacth here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-12/msg00116.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18197
--- Comment #6 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-06 18:03
---
Working on a patch.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 14:49 ---
While the original problem seems to have been fixed, we have a regression here:
if we comment out the line marked as "this works" everything compiles fine and
we get an executable that works (doesn't segfault), if we co
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-27 16:46 ---
We get an ICE now:
t.f90:26: internal compiler error: in gfc_trans_arrayfunc_assign, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:2632
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Bug 18197 depends on bug 20960, which changed state.
Bug 20960 Summary: bus error for return an array
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20960
What|Old Value |New Value
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||20960
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18197
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-08 23:58
---
For the second call we generate:
atmp.12.dtype = 281;
atmp.12.data = 0B;
atmp.12.offset = 0;
atmp.12.dim[0].stride = 0;
... (no changes to atmp.12
funname (&atmp.12, (int4 *) n, &a
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 13:26
---
Confirmed, this is a front-end issue.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From niilo dot sirola at tut dot fi 2004-10-28 12:33
---
*** Bug 18196 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18197
15 matches
Mail list logo
