[Bug fortran/16206] rejects valid array initialization expression

2006-07-03 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16206

[Bug fortran/16206] rejects valid array initialization expression

2006-06-29 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #13 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-06-29 21:35 --- Subject: Bug number PR16206 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg00911.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s

[Bug fortran/16206] rejects valid array initialization expression

2006-06-23 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 15:41 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/16206] rejects valid array initialization expression

2006-06-22 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 04:47 --- Subject: Bug 16206 Author: pault Date: Fri Jun 23 04:46:50 2006 New Revision: 114925 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114925 Log: 2006-06-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran

[Bug fortran/16206] rejects valid array initialization expression

2006-06-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 04:31 --- Subject: Bug 16206 Author: pault Date: Tue Jun 20 04:30:48 2006 New Revision: 114802 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114802 Log: 2006-06-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran

[Bug fortran/16206] rejects valid array initialization expression

2006-06-16 Thread paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
--- Comment #9 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-06-16 16:18 --- Subject: Re: rejects valid array initialization expression Harald, >You might wish to extend this to m(5) = ..., because: > > > >> integer, parameter :: p(8) = (/(m(i:i+1), i = 1,4)/) >> >> > >the last acce

[Bug fortran/16206] rejects valid array initialization expression

2006-06-16 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2006-06-16 08:23 --- (In reply to comment #7) Paul, thanks for looking into this! > program gfortran_bug2 [...] > integer, parameter :: m(4) = (/1,2,3,4/) You might wish to extend this to m(5) = ..., because: > integer, parameter :: p(8)

[Bug fortran/16206] rejects valid array initialization expression

2006-06-15 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-15 17:39 --- Created an attachment (id=11675) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11675&action=view) A near submission level patch for the PR I have not marked the previous version as obsolete because it could wel

[Bug fortran/16206] rejects valid array initialization expression

2006-06-09 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-09 19:40 --- I seem to be on the way to fixing this, so I had beter assign it to myself! Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/16206] rejects valid array initialization expression

2006-06-09 Thread paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
--- Comment #5 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-06-09 15:19 --- Created an attachment (id=11647) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11647&action=view) An experimental fix for the PR This was to have been the second of the two approaches, described ab

[Bug fortran/16206] rejects valid array initialization expression

2006-06-06 Thread paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
--- Comment #4 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-06-06 11:46 --- (In reply to comment #3) > This bug report is approaching its second anniversary. > Does anybody still watch it or take care? Yes, Harald. I have been looking these last days at a number of array initia

[Bug fortran/16206] rejects valid array initialization expression

2006-05-29 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2006-05-29 21:22 --- This bug report is approaching its second anniversary. Does anybody still watch it or take care? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16206