[Bug fortran/116733] [F202y] Generic processing of assumed rank objects

2024-10-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116733 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c5fa2108ce0f3030cb28f47a18bc974c4224b66d commit r15-4573-gc5fa2108ce0f3030cb28f47a18bc974c4224b66d Author: Paul Thomas Date: Wed O

[Bug fortran/116733] [F202y] Generic processing of assumed rank objects

2024-09-23 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116733 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Working through J3/24-136r1 by Malcolm Cohen Subject: DIN-4: Generic processing of assumed-rank objects Date: 2024-June-24 1. Introduction "DIN-4 suggests "Allow generic processing of assumed-rank argum

[Bug fortran/116733] [F202y] Generic processing of assumed rank objects

2024-09-20 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116733 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Before submission of the patch, will give consideration to Malcolm Cohen's https://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/24/24-136r1.txt Paul

[Bug fortran/116733] [F202y] Generic processing of assumed rank objects

2024-09-20 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116733 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #59119|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/116733] [F202y] Generic processing of assumed rank objects

2024-09-16 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116733 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 59126 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59126&action=edit First testcase ditto

[Bug fortran/116733] [F202y] Generic processing of assumed rank objects

2024-09-16 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116733 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 59125 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59125&action=edit Second testcase I forgot to include these in the patch:-(