https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
--- Comment #15 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Paul,
the fix was fine for 15-mainline and 14-branch.
There seems to be testsuite fallout on 13-branch (pr116040), because this
fix apparently depends on the fix for pr89645, which is quite lar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c81ff02a943cda82cc1a82b36ae8ab14470b00a
commit r13-8926-g7c81ff02a943cda82cc1a82b36ae8ab14470b00a
Author: Paul Thomas
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d15664f71c150a1b0e6cc07c0534b356b111344d
commit r14-10478-gd15664f71c150a1b0e6cc07c0534b356b111344d
Author: Paul Thomas
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #10)
> Leave open partly because it is awaiting backporting to 14-branch but also
> because there are remaining, pre-existing issues involving parentheses
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Leave open partly because it is awaiting backporting to 14-branch but also
because there are remaining, pre-existing issues involving parentheses around
selector/source expressions:
https://gcc.gnu.org/piperm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d0eeb529d400e61197a09c56011be976dd81ef0
commit r15-394-g2d0eeb529d400e61197a09c56011be976dd81ef0
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Mon Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.0|14.2
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 57892
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57892&action=edit
Fix for this PR
The attachment has two fixes for the PR :-)
The first chunk in trans-array.cc is an alternativ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |REOPENED
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|WAITING
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2)
> >
> > Both allocation with source and assignment are broken :-(
>
> With numerical output from foo ([1,2,3,4,5]), we get:
>
>1 3 5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-01-14
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #0)
> While discussing a patch for PR89645/99065, the following issue with
> ASSOCIATE and unlimited polymorphic functions was found:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran
15 matches
Mail list logo
