https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109066
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6f90e015f642424ba0e94871d9389facaca5395
commit r14-11396-gf6f90e015f642424ba0e94871d9389facaca5395
Author: Paul Thomas
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109066
Matthew Krupcale changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkrupcale at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109066
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:27ff8049bbdb0a001ba46835cd6a334c4ac76573
commit r15-5347-g27ff8049bbdb0a001ba46835cd6a334c4ac76573
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Sat N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109066
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Benson ---
With apologies for the long delay in replying - thanks for pointing out that I
had the result of a constructor undefined. In this updated example I think that
constructor results are now correctly defined, b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109066
--- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Steve,
Indeed - I found that paragraph shortly after writing. Thanks for posting
it.
Cheers
Paul
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 15:33, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109066
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109066
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the report. However, IMHO the code is invalid since the result of
hdf5Constructor is not defined.
function hdf5Constructor() result(self)
implicit none
type(hdf5Object) :: sel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109066
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-03-09
CC|
