https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d307fda2b9ba71fe18f1449f7444bed7ff05193
commit r12-9055-g6d307fda2b9ba71fe18f1449f7444bed7ff05193
Author: Jerry DeLisle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I will backport to 12 as it is an ice on Valid.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #12 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731
--- Comment #11 from federico ---
Thank you.
I can confirm the patch works.
I thought that, while fixing the issue, removing the assert was not the best
solution as automatic arrays are not supposed to be static. My bad.
Happy holidays,
Fe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e76cd96950f49ce21246d44780e972d86b2bcdd
commit r13-4862-g7e76cd96950f49ce21246d44780e972d86b2bcdd
Author: Steve Kargl
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #8)
> The simple patch does indeed fix the ICE at compile time. It also
> regression tests cleanly.
>
> I am studying the results of running this test case to be sur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731
--- Comment #6 from federico ---
Yeah this popped up playing with DTIO, this feature is not widely used
apparently. I'll also try to get a copy of the gcc source code and build
pipeline to see if I can help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 07:10:20PM +, federico.perini at gmail dot com
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731
>
> --- Comment #4 from federico ---
> The TREE_STATIC assert should be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731
--- Comment #4 from federico ---
The TREE_STATIC assert should be valid according to what reported in the
implementation at report https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298
But, I can't tell what that means.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731
--- Comment #2 from federico ---
For the sake of completeness, fixed-size does not cause an ICE:
type(t) :: fixed(5) ! works
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
15 matches
Mail list logo
