https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106576
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106576
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7caf313525a46f200d7f5db1ba893f853774aee
commit r13-6747-gd7caf313525a46f200d7f5db1ba893f853774aee
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Sat M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106576
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #6)
>
> > I hope that you are well and that the lack of time is for a good cause?
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> yes, I'm well, and the lack of time is indeed for a good cause :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106576
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
> I hope that you are well and that the lack of time is for a good cause?
Hi Paul,
yes, I'm well, and the lack of time is indeed for a good cause :-)
> I have just returned to my finalizer patch. With it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106576
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Hi Thomas,
I hope that you are well and that the lack of time is for a good cause?
I have just returned to my finalizer patch. With it applied, your testcase
produces the same output as NAG.
I will attach t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106576
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 53977
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53977&action=edit
Ongoing patch for PR37336
Fixes this PR, so testcase will be added to the collection.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106576
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106576
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106576
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
There currently is a c.l.f. thread on this, with this test case.
Although what nagfor and xlf are doing makes sense, it does
not (to me) follow from the language of the standard.
https://groups.google.com/g
