https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106500
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106500
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ded646c91d2c0fb908faf6fa8fe1df0d7df49d16
commit r14-9893-gded646c91d2c0fb908faf6fa8fe1df0d7df49d16
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106500
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106500
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> What is unclear to me: when is an expression interoperable?
> Or rather when is it *not*?
>
> (Note that the standard text has not essentially changed since
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106500
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106500
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106500
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #2 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106500
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Changed subject as it's unclear whether it is invalid or not. In any case,
this patch allows the code to compile and it produces the expected output.
% gfcx -o z a.f90
% ./z
4
16
diff --git a/
