[Bug fortran/101602] [F2018] local and local_init are not supported in DO CONCURRENT

2025-04-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101602 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f417af3f9f94538c2600e78e6c60b61c29fdbf99 commit r15-9393-gf417af3f9f94538c2600e78e6c60b61c29fdbf99 Author: Thomas Schwinge Date:

[Bug fortran/101602] [F2018] local and local_init are not supported in DO CONCURRENT

2025-04-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101602 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d7e1d6e40a13a5f160b584336795b80f193ec3b commit r15-9326-g2d7e1d6e40a13a5f160b584336795b80f193ec3b Author: Tobias Burnus Date: W

[Bug fortran/101602] [F2018] local and local_init are not supported in DO CONCURRENT

2025-01-25 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101602 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- I have the patch applied here. do_concurrent_12.f90 has six failures that look like related to optimization. I will see if I can figure this out. Running /home/jerry/dev/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dg.e

[Bug fortran/101602] [F2018] local and local_init are not supported in DO CONCURRENT

2025-01-25 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101602 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/101602] [F2018] local and local_init are not supported in DO CONCURRENT

2025-01-25 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101602 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus --- Created attachment 60279 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60279&action=edit Draft patch - see comment 6 for known issues ... this includes REDUCE. Note that no real concurrency except fo

[Bug fortran/101602] [F2018] local and local_init are not supported in DO CONCURRENT

2025-01-25 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101602 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/101602] [F2018] local and local_init are not supported in DO CONCURRENT

2023-08-16 Thread marshall.ward at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101602 --- Comment #4 from Marshall Ward --- Thank you Michael, that is very informative, particularly with respect to LOCAL_INIT vs FIRSTPRIVATE. If we could just get support for LOCAL, then we may be to start using do-concurrent in our production co

[Bug fortran/101602] [F2018] local and local_init are not supported in DO CONCURRENT

2023-08-14 Thread michael at dontknow dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101602 --- Comment #3 from Michael Klemm --- The locality specifiers cannot directly map to the OpenMP data-sharing clauses. While SHARED and LOCAL can be mapped, LOCAL_INIT cannot. The latter needs to initialize the variable anew for each iteration

[Bug fortran/101602] [F2018] local and local_init are not supported in DO CONCURRENT

2023-08-14 Thread marshall.ward at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101602 Marshall Ward changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marshall.ward at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug fortran/101602] [F2018] local and local_init are not supported in DO CONCURRENT

2021-11-06 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101602 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-06 C