[Bug fortran/101564] ICE in resolve_allocate_deallocate, at fortran/resolve.c:8169

2021-08-11 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101564 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/101564] ICE in resolve_allocate_deallocate, at fortran/resolve.c:8169

2021-08-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101564 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ee9e57684e27d27ff12e2b93ab7ae3d46861593 commit r11-8852-g4ee9e57684e27d27ff12e2b93ab7ae3d46861593 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/101564] ICE in resolve_allocate_deallocate, at fortran/resolve.c:8169

2021-07-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101564 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bf582e6cfcef922a087b1b2b42aa04ea9cb2d94 commit r12-2577-g7bf582e6cfcef922a087b1b2b42aa04ea9cb2d94 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: W

[Bug fortran/101564] ICE in resolve_allocate_deallocate, at fortran/resolve.c:8169

2021-07-21 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101564 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 08:37:02PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-July/056264.html > OK. J

[Bug fortran/101564] ICE in resolve_allocate_deallocate, at fortran/resolve.c:8169

2021-07-21 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101564 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/101564] ICE in resolve_allocate_deallocate, at fortran/resolve.c:8169

2021-07-21 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101564 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > The %kind was introduced probably in r9, so likely not a real regression. > > I am testing the following patch: > > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc

[Bug fortran/101564] ICE in resolve_allocate_deallocate, at fortran/resolve.c:8169

2021-07-21 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101564 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The %kind was introduced probably in r9, so likely not a real regression. I am testing the following patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c index 45c3ad387ac..51d31211

[Bug fortran/101564] ICE in resolve_allocate_deallocate, at fortran/resolve.c:8169

2021-07-21 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101564 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Last reconfirmed|