http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46802
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46802
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-04 19:06:01
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> This is not a GCC bug. It is correct that the message says "g++". (You
> have not given a convincing analysis of why it breaks anything, but the
> bug is still
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46802
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-04 18:56:17 UTC ---
This is not a GCC bug. It is correct that the message says "g++". (You
have not given a convincing analysis of why it breaks anything, but the
bug is still not in C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46802
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-04 18:49:29
UTC ---
You can use GCC 4.6 to run "make check" in ld to see the
failures for yourselves.
I checked this patch into binutils:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-12/msg00189.html
to work aroun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46802
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-04 18:44:51 UTC ---
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> g++: warning: switch '-fvtable-gc' is no longer supported
> g++: warning: switch '-fvtable-gc' is no longer sup
