https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
--- Comment #12 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #10)
> I'll file the actual ada example.
PR94469 - "lto abstract variable emitted as concrete decl (ada test-case)"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
>
> --- Comment #10 from Tom de Vries ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
--- Comment #10 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #9)
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
> >
> > --- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries ---
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
>
> --- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
--- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> The DW_TAG_imported_unit are now gone for GCC 10. So can we consider this
> fixed?
I'd like a PR to refer to at the to-be-added xfail in the gdb test-case (and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
The DW_TAG_imported_unit are now gone for GCC 10. So can we consider this
fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:54af95767e887d63dc332731738e642536d87a48
commit r10-7521-g54af95767e887d63dc332731738e642536d87a48
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I guess the more correct DWARF would be to have the 13d DIE include
> DW_AT_declaration?
Well, currently the debug info contains two concrete symbols, one with a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 48168
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48168&action=edit
patch to drop DW_TAG_imported_unit DIEs
I'm testing this patch. Does it help?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> So the current situation is similar to that of
Modifying the testcase to C99
inline int foo(int i)
{
static int j;
j = i + 1;
return j;
}
int bar(int i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
So the current situation is similar to that of
static inline int foo(int i)
{
static int j;
j = i + 1;
return j;
}
int bar(int i)
{
return foo(i);
}
int baz(int i)
{
return foo(i);
}
here we ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-02
Keywords|
13 matches
Mail list logo
