https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
--- Comment #21 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Sep 13 17:26:12 2017
New Revision: 252559
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252559&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-24 Richard Biener
PR debug/81936
* dwarf2out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
--- Comment #20 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #19)
> Fixed.
Thanks for fixing this.
libgomp with nvptx offloading is back to known fails:
...
# of unexpected failures24
# of expected passes83
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Aug 24 13:41:51 2017
New Revision: 251332
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251332&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-24 Richard Biener
PR debug/81936
* dwarf2o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 42036
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42036&action=edit
patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
--- Comment #15 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #14)
> That looks odd, I'll see if I can reproduce tomorrow.
FYI, there are scripts at
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Offloading#How_to_try_offloading_enabled_GCC that s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On August 23, 2017 6:52:40 PM GMT+02:00, "vries at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
>
>--- Comment #13 from Tom de Vries ---
>I've tried to see if I co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
--- Comment #13 from Tom de Vries ---
I've tried to see if I could workaround the problem by disabling the assert:
...
diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.c b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
index 0c339bd46f0..b2df3b89c2e 100644
--- a/gcc/dwarf2out.c
+++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
--- Comment #12 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #11)
> > And then we run into the next ICE:
> Shit happens ;)
Heh, it does :)
> Is that now the offload compiler?
Nope, still the host compiler, we're ICE-ing d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
>
> --- Comment #9 from Tom de Vries ---
> (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #8)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
>
> --- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
--- Comment #9 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #8)
> but found it doesn't work because flag_generate_offload is actually false.
>
> I'm now trying this (code snippet copied from symbol_table::compile), but
> I'm not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
--- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #7)
> Ah, yeah. And we can have both, right?
I'd say so. There's f.i. libgomp.c/target-9.c, which contains '#pragma omp
target' and uses -flto.
> So we'd either n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
>
> --- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
> > what failed to properly set its parent?
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
> what failed to properly set its parent?
dwarf2out_early_finish contains:
...
/* Do not generate DWARF assembler now when not producing LTO bytecode. */
if (!flag_generate_lto)
return;
...
and this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> How do I reproduce, aka configure gcc?
The ICE is actually in the host compiler, but it doesn't seem to reproduce in a
non-offloading setup.
Host compiler:
OFF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
ICE is due to assert:
...
at gcc/dwarf2out.c:5542
5542 gcc_assert (die->die_tag == DW_TAG_compile_unit
5543 && die->die_id.die_symbol != NULL);
...
The assert triggers because die->d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
How do I reproduce, aka configure gcc?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81936
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
20 matches
Mail list logo
