[Bug debug/63239] DWARF does not represent C++ deleted methods

2014-11-21 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63239 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug debug/63239] DWARF does not represent C++ deleted methods

2014-11-21 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63239 --- Comment #11 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Fri Nov 21 13:32:08 2014 New Revision: 217920 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217920&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/63239 * g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/deleted-member

[Bug debug/63239] DWARF does not represent C++ deleted methods

2014-11-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63239 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- You should pass -gno-strict-dwarf unconditionally, I think vxworks has similar defaults as darwin.

[Bug debug/63239] DWARF does not represent C++ deleted methods

2014-11-21 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63239 --- Comment #9 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Fri Nov 21 13:27:57 2014 New Revision: 217918 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217918&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/63239 * g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/deleted-member-

[Bug debug/63239] DWARF does not represent C++ deleted methods

2014-11-21 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63239 --- Comment #8 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > So using > -gdwarf-2 and -gstrict-dwarf by default is necessary because of badly > written toolchain. I had tried -gdwarf-4, but didn't know about -gst

[Bug debug/63239] DWARF does not represent C++ deleted methods

2014-11-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63239 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #6) > It looks like for some reason Darwin defaults to some ancient (v2) strict > version of DWARF. Please try adding -gno-strict-dwarf -gdwarf-4 to > gcc/testsuite/g++

[Bug debug/63239] DWARF does not represent C++ deleted methods

2014-11-21 Thread mark at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63239 --- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard --- It looks like for some reason Darwin defaults to some ancient (v2) strict version of DWARF. Please try adding -gno-strict-dwarf -gdwarf-4 to gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/deleted-member-function.C dg-opti

[Bug debug/63239] DWARF does not represent C++ deleted methods

2014-11-21 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63239 --- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Created attachment 34063 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34063&action=edit Assembler generated at -O -std=c++11 -g -dA

[Bug debug/63239] DWARF does not represent C++ deleted methods

2014-11-21 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63239 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/63239] DWARF does not represent C++ deleted methods

2014-10-05 Thread mark at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63239 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/63239] DWARF does not represent C++ deleted methods

2014-10-05 Thread mark at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63239 --- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard --- Author: mark Date: Sun Oct 5 15:25:03 2014 New Revision: 215901 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215901&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/63239 Add DWARF representation for C++11 deleted member function.

[Bug debug/63239] DWARF does not represent C++ deleted methods

2014-09-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63239 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,