http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54534
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54534
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54534
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-11
10:43:17 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 11 10:43:13 2012
New Revision: 191176
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191176
Log:
2012-09-11 Richard Guenther
PR debug/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54534
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-09-11 10:38:32 UTC ---
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54534
>
> --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2012-09-11
> 10:19:04 UTC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54534
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2012-09-11
10:19:04 UTC ---
Well, the patch really is quite symptomatic - i.e. dwarf2out should not forget
about the decl when it is removed from varpool.
The way things are supposed to work (I believe) is to call
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54534
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-11
09:49:27 UTC ---
I am testing
Index: gcc/cgraph.h
===
--- gcc/cgraph.h(revision 191174)
+++ gcc/cgraph.h(working copy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54534
Joel Brobecker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brobecker at gnat dot com
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54534
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
