http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36728
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-28
23:01:14 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 28 23:01:03 2012
New Revision: 193911
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193911
Log:
PR debug/36728
PR debug/55467
--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-10 18:17 ---
Subject: Bug 36728
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 10 18:17:10 2010
New Revision: 157363
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157363
Log:
PR debug/43290
* reg-notes.def (REG_CFA_SET_VDRA
--- Comment #12 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-06 01:21
---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFI
--- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-06 01:19 ---
Subject: Bug 36728
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Jul 6 01:18:49 2008
New Revision: 137517
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137517
Log:
2008-07-05 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Xuepeng Guo <[
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-04 20:35
---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg00347.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-04 16:04 ---
We can start with
Index: config/i386/i386.c
===
--- config/i386/i386.c (revision 137474)
+++ config/i386/i386.c (working copy)
@@ -6628,7 +6628,7 @@
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-04 15:21 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Joey, this is caused by ix86_get_drap_rtx:
>
> Do we really need vDRAP?
>
Yes, it is needed. Xuepeng, we need to update dwarf2out.c to track
vDRAP.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-04 15:16 ---
Joey, this is caused by ix86_get_drap_rtx:
/* Assign DRAP to vDRAP and returns vDRAP */
unsigned int regno = find_drap_reg ();
rtx drap_vreg;
rtx arg_ptr;
rtx seq;
arg_ptr = gen_
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-04 15:04 ---
The code in question is
movq%r10, %rax #, tmp73
movl%edi, -52(%rbp) # dummy1, dummy1
movl%esi, -56(%rbp) # dummy2, dummy2
movl%edx, -60(%rbp) # dummy3, dummy3
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-04 14:40 ---
Xuepeng, revision 137460 fixes both local variables
and incoming arguments on 32bit. But it still fails
incoming arguments on 64bit:
bash-3.2$ ./xgcc -B./ -g /tmp/foo.c
bash-3.2$ gdb foo
GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-10.fc9
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 14:18 ---
Subject: Bug 36728
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jul 4 14:17:18 2008
New Revision: 137460
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137460
Log:
2008-07-04 Xuepeng Guo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR debug/36728
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 13:46 ---
Great. That IMHO blocks the merge of the stack-branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36728
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-04 13:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=15853)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15853&action=view)
A testcase without drap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stack-10]$
/export/build/gnu/gcc-stack-internal/build-x86_64-linux/g
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-04 13:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=15852)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15852&action=view)
A testcase with drap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stack-10]$
/export/build/gnu/gcc-stack-internal/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/
14 matches
Mail list logo
