--- Comment #7 from jeff at schwabcenter dot com 2008-03-07 23:43 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html does not list
-Wswitch-default being enabled by -Wall.
--
jeff at schwabcenter dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from jeff at schwabcenter dot com 2008-03-07 23:42 ---
> Is there any particular reason for changing the docs, rather than the code?
Kindly disregard that question. I have just been informed by a co-worker that
some of our third-party library headers include switch stat
--- Comment #5 from jeff at schwabcenter dot com 2008-03-07 23:38 ---
Thanks for the quick response and the links. FYI, the latter link seems to be
broken:
http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20071001.204624.0ca57fae.de.html
Is there any particular reason for changing the docs, rather
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-07 23:31 ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg01761.html and
http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20071001.204624.0ca57fae.de.html
.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-07 23:26 ---
This is a documentation fix which has already happened, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html .
-Wall
This enables all the warnings about constructions that some users consider
questionable, and
--- Comment #2 from jeff at schwabcenter dot com 2008-03-07 23:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=15278)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15278&action=view)
Fix for this bug
Setting warn_switch_default = value in the OPT_Wall case of
c_common_handle_option (in gcc/c-opt
--- Comment #1 from jeff at schwabcenter dot com 2008-03-07 23:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=15277)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15277&action=view)
Preprocessed sample code
Compiling the attached file with g++ -Wall should produce "warning: switch
missing defau
